Rapid Fire Abstracts
Yoko Kato, MD, PhD
Research Associate
The Johns Hopkins University
Yoko Kato, MD, PhD
Research Associate
The Johns Hopkins University
Makoto Natsumeda, MD
Associate Professor
Tokai University Hospital, Japan
Kensuke Takagi, MD, PhD
Chief physician
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Hospital, Japan
Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh, PhD
Physicist
The John Hopkins Hospital
Yoshiaki Ohyama, MD, PhD
Clinical Investigation and Research Unit, Gunma University Hospital, Japan
Chikara Noda, PhD
Research associate
The Johns Hopkins University
Mohammad Ostovaneh, MD
Cardiology Fellow
The John Hopkins Hospital
Yuji Ikari, MD, PhD
Professor, director
Tokai University, Japan
Joao A. C Lima, MD
Professor
The Johns Hopkins University
The LAST-PASS study randomly allocated participants to ELCA or conventional PCI arm in a 1:1 ratio, and included only patients with a first-episode STEMI treated with primary PCI caused by proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) culprit lesion of < 6 hrs onset, having initial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow of 0 or1. Exclusion criteria included a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery or the presence of any cardiac device. Participants without atrial fibrillation underwent CMR at acute (5-9 days post-STEMI) and chronic (6 months post-STEMI) phases. CMR protocol included CINE, T2WBB, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (at 17 min post 0.15 mmol/kg of Gadovist, Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin-Wedding, Germany) [5]. Images were quantified using QMass version 7.6 (Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Leiden, the Netherlands). The effect of ELCA on IMH or MVO was assessed using multivariable regression analyses, with adjustments for clinical and interventional covariates through stepwise forward selection (p< 0.2).
Results: Sixty-six participants were enrolled in the CMR study. Demographics, interventional, and CMR measurements including the presence and size of MVO and IMH were comparable between ELCA and control groups. However, ELCA group had less aspiration (i.e., intracoronary thrombectomy device that vacuums the thrombus) use and lower acute phase left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (Table 1). In the multivariable analysis, ELCA did not influence the presence or size of IMH and MVO (Table 1). Post-hoc analysis on the combined effect of ELCA and aspiration use suggested a trend to reduce MVO. Representative images in Figure 1.
Conclusion:
ELCA did not show benefit in diminishing IMH or MVO, which may suggest that debulking the thrombus without reducing its total volume may be insufficient to prevent reperfusion injury [6,7]. Post-hoc analysis suggests the possible synergy of ELCA with aspiration. CMR successfully quantifies IMH and MVO and represents the most powerful phenotyping tool for post-MI reperfusion injury quantification.